Few science-fiction franchises have undergone as many transformations as Planet of the Apes. What began as a satirical French novel in 1963 became a groundbreaking American film in 1968, spawned four sequels, two television series, comics and other tie-in media, a controversial 2001 remake, and eventually a highly successful reboot beginning in 2011.
The franchise has also demonstrated remarkable staying power because it is about much more than talking apes. At various times, Planet of the Apes has explored human arrogance, racism, social class, animal rights, nuclear war, evolution, slavery, environmental destruction, scientific experimentation, and the dangers of civilization.
The franchise has now produced ten theatrical films, with Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes continuing the modern series in 2024.
Pierre Boulle and the Original Novel
The story begins not in Hollywood but in France.
Pierre Boulle was born in 1912 and became a novelist after a varied life that included military service and work in Southeast Asia. He is probably best known in the English-speaking world for two novels: The Bridge over the River Kwai and Planet of the Apes.
Links in this post are Amazon affiliate links.
His original novel, published in 1963 as La Planète des singes, is considerably different from the movies that followed.
The basic premise is familiar. A group of humans travels through space and discovers a planet where intelligent apes dominate society and humans occupy an inferior position.
But Boulle's version is more satirical and philosophical than the later movies.
The apes have created a sophisticated technological civilization. They have automobiles, aircraft, laboratories, universities, and a highly developed scientific culture.
Humans, meanwhile, are regarded as primitive animals.
The novel therefore reverses the traditional assumptions of human civilization.
The central question becomes:
What if we were the animals in someone else's zoo?
The Great Twist
Boulle's novel contains an important element that was transformed for the 1968 film.
The protagonist eventually discovers that humans once possessed the dominant civilization on the planet, but through a process of degeneration and the rise of intelligent apes, humanity lost its position.
Boulle was interested in the idea that civilization itself might be temporary.
Human beings assume that their intelligence makes them naturally superior.
But what if intelligence is not permanently associated with one species?
This idea became the foundation of the entire franchise.
Planet of the Apes Comes to Hollywood
The novel attracted the attention of American producer Arthur P. Jacobs, who acquired the film rights.
Turning the novel into a movie presented an enormous challenge.
How could Hollywood convincingly portray intelligent apes?
The answer involved an extraordinary combination of makeup, acting, production design, and special effects.
The screenplay was developed by writers including Rod Serling, best known as the creator of The Twilight Zone, and Michael Wilson.
Serling helped transform Boulle's story into a darker and more politically charged film.
The result was Planet of the Apes (1968), directed by Franklin J. Schaffner.
5The 1968 Film
Charlton Heston played George Taylor, an American astronaut who travels into deep space.
Taylor and his companions eventually land on a strange planet.
They discover that humans are mute and treated as animals.
The dominant civilization consists of intelligent apes divided into recognizable social groups:
- Chimpanzees tend to be scientists and intellectuals.
- Orangutans are associated with government and religion.
- Gorillas tend to be soldiers and enforcers.
This social structure became one of the franchise's most memorable concepts.
Taylor eventually discovers the terrible truth.
The planet is actually Earth.
Human civilization has destroyed itself, and the apes have inherited the planet.
The film concludes with Taylor discovering the remains of the Statue of Liberty.
It is one of the most famous endings in science-fiction cinema.
The implication is devastating:
Taylor has not traveled to another planet. He has traveled into Earth's future.
Why the Original Film Was So Important
The 1968 film was a major success.
But its importance went far beyond box-office performance.
It demonstrated that science fiction could combine:
- Serious social commentary
- Political allegory
- Horror
- Action
- Philosophical questions
- Spectacular entertainment
The film was also released during the Cold War, when nuclear weapons created genuine fears about human civilization destroying itself.
The ending therefore resonated with contemporary audiences.
The movie was asking a frightening question:
What happens if humanity destroys itself?
Beneath the Planet of the Apes
The success of the first movie led to Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970).
Charlton Heston returned, although his role was reduced.
The film introduced a new protagonist, Brent, played by James Franciscus.
Brent discovers an underground civilization consisting of humans who have survived the nuclear destruction of Earth.
These survivors worship an enormous nuclear weapon.
The film's nuclear-war theme was even more explicit than that of its predecessor.
It also took the franchise in a surprisingly dark direction.
The ending effectively destroys the planet.
The original Apes series therefore did something unusual for a major Hollywood franchise:
It allowed its story to reach an apparent apocalypse rather than continually resetting the status quo.
Escape from the Planet of the Apes
The third film, Escape from the Planet of the Apes (1971), took the story in a completely different direction.
Scientists Cornelius and Zira, played by Roddy McDowall and Kim Hunter, travel backward through time and arrive in twentieth-century America.
Now the apes are the outsiders.
At first they are treated as celebrities.
But humans eventually learn about the future.
They become terrified that the intelligent apes will eventually replace humanity.
The film becomes a story about fear, prejudice, and the consequences of trying to prevent a predicted future.
It also introduced the idea that history might be changed through time travel.
This would become central to the remaining films.
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972) moved the story into the near future.
In this timeline, humans have begun using apes as servants and slaves.
Cornelius and Zira's son, Caesar, becomes the leader of an ape rebellion.
The film is much more explicitly political than the earlier movies.
It addresses:
- Slavery
- Racism
- Oppression
- Police power
- Rebellion
- Revolutionary violence
Caesar's uprising eventually leads to the establishment of an ape civilization.
The film therefore provides an explanation for how the world seen in the first movie came into existence.
Battle for the Planet of the Apes
The original film series concluded with Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973).
Caesar now leads an ape community attempting to establish a peaceful society.
Humans and apes must learn to coexist.
The film is less bleak than its predecessors and focuses more heavily on the possibility of reconciliation.
It also attempts to reconcile the increasingly complicated time-travel mythology.
The five original films therefore form a loose cycle:
- Planet of the Apes — humanity's future.
- Beneath the Planet of the Apes — nuclear destruction.
- Escape from the Planet of the Apes — apes travel into humanity's past.
- Conquest of the Planet of the Apes — Caesar leads the ape rebellion.
- Battle for the Planet of the Apes — the new ape civilization attempts to build a peaceful future.
Together they constitute one of the most ambitious science-fiction film cycles of the 1960s and 1970s.
Roddy McDowall and Planet of the Apes
One actor deserves special attention.
Roddy McDowall became closely identified with the franchise.
He first played Cornelius in the original film, then returned as Caesar in Conquest and Battle.
He also played Galen in the 1974 television series.
McDowall therefore became the actor most consistently associated with the Apes universe.
His performances helped demonstrate that the ape characters weren't simply special-effects creations.
They were fully developed characters with distinct personalities.
The 1974 Television Series
The success of the films led CBS to develop a live-action television series.
Planet of the Apes premiered in September 1974.
The series followed astronauts Alan Virdon and Peter Burke, who crash-land in the future and discover an Earth ruled by intelligent apes.
Roddy McDowall returned, this time playing the chimpanzee Galen.
Other major characters included:
- Galen
- General Urko
- Councillor Zaius
- Alan Virdon
- Peter Burke
The astronauts traveled from community to community while searching for a way home and avoiding the authorities.
The series lasted only 14 episodes, airing from September through December 1974.
Its short run was partly a consequence of the difficulty and expense of producing an elaborate science-fiction series on 1970s television.
Return to the Planet of the Apes
A second television series followed in 1975.
This time it was animated.
Return to the Planet of the Apes was produced by DePatie–Freleng Enterprises and aired on NBC.
It ran for 13 episodes.
Interestingly, the animated series presented a much more technologically sophisticated ape civilization, including automobiles, television, and other advanced technology.
In that respect, it was closer to aspects of Pierre Boulle's original novel than the relatively primitive ape civilization depicted in the live-action films.
The 2001 Remake
For decades, Hollywood attempted to bring Planet of the Apes back to the big screen.
Eventually Tim Burton directed Planet of the Apes (2001), starring Mark Wahlberg.
This was not a continuation of the original series.
It was a reimagining of the concept.
The movie retained the basic premise of humans encountering an ape civilization but changed many of the details.
The film received a mixed critical response, although it was financially successful.
The 2001 film did not generate the planned series of sequels.
Instead, the franchise disappeared from cinemas for another decade.
But Hollywood had not given up on the concept.
The 2011 Reboot
The next attempt was dramatically more successful.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) effectively restarted the franchise.
Rather than beginning with humans discovering an ape civilization, the film asked:
How did the apes become intelligent in the first place?
This was an important change.
The protagonist was not an astronaut.
It was an ape.
His name was Caesar.
Caesar is a genetically enhanced chimpanzee whose intelligence increases dramatically as a result of scientific experimentation.
The film follows his relationship with humans and his gradual realization that he belongs neither completely to the human world nor to the world of ordinary apes.
The film was a major success and established a new continuity.
Caesar
The new Caesar, portrayed through motion-capture performance by Andy Serkis, became the central character of the reboot trilogy.
This was one of the most important innovations of the new films.
Caesar was not simply a monster or villain.
He was a protagonist.
The audience watched him:
- Learn language
- Develop intelligence
- Form relationships
- Experience betrayal
- Establish a community
- Become a leader
- Make moral decisions
The character gave the franchise an emotional center that was very different from the original movies.
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (2014) takes place after a devastating pandemic has killed much of humanity.
Caesar now leads an ape community in the wilderness.
The surviving humans encounter the apes.
At first, both groups attempt to coexist.
But fear, mistrust, and violence gradually undermine the relationship.
The film explores a recurring theme of the franchise:
Can two intelligent societies coexist when both fear the other?
Dawn is arguably the most politically sophisticated film of the reboot trilogy.
It presents neither side as completely good or evil.
Both humans and apes contain individuals capable of compassion and individuals capable of terrible violence.
War for the Planet of the Apes
War for the Planet of the Apes (2017) brings Caesar's story toward its conclusion.
Caesar's community is attacked by human soldiers commanded by a ruthless military leader known as the Colonel.
Caesar becomes determined to protect his people.
The film combines elements of:
- War movie
- Western
- Biblical epic
- Prison escape
- Science fiction
Caesar's journey is ultimately a story about leadership, revenge, forgiveness, and sacrifice.
The film was widely praised and brought the Caesar trilogy to a natural conclusion.
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
The franchise returned to theaters in 2024 with Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes.
Directed by Wes Ball, the movie takes place many generations after Caesar's death.
Caesar is now a legendary historical figure rather than the protagonist.
The ape civilization has evolved into a number of competing societies.
The main character is a young chimpanzee named Noa.
Noa's peaceful community is attacked, beginning a journey that forces him to confront the legacy of Caesar and the direction in which ape civilization is heading.
This was an important change for the franchise.
Instead of simply continuing Caesar's story, Kingdom asks what happens when a revolutionary leader becomes a mythological and historical figure.
The film therefore begins to explore the same kind of historical process that humans experience.
Caesar's actual teachings become mixed with legends and distorted interpretations.
The Different Planet of the Apes Timelines
One reason the franchise can seem confusing is that there isn't one simple continuity.
There are essentially three major cinematic continuities.
The Original Continuity
- Planet of the Apes — 1968
- Beneath the Planet of the Apes — 1970
- Escape from the Planet of the Apes — 1971
- Conquest of the Planet of the Apes — 1972
- Battle for the Planet of the Apes — 1973
The 1974 live-action and 1975 animated television series are related to the original concept but operate with their own variations.
The Tim Burton Film
- Planet of the Apes — 2001
This is a separate reimagining rather than a continuation of the original series.
The Modern Continuity
- Rise of the Planet of the Apes — 2011
- Dawn of the Planet of the Apes — 2014
- War for the Planet of the Apes — 2017
- Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes — 2024
The 2011–2024 films form a new continuity.
The Major Themes of Planet of the Apes
The franchise has remained relevant because its stories are about much more than apes.
Nuclear War
The original films emerged during the Cold War.
The possibility that humanity could destroy itself through nuclear weapons was a major theme.
Beneath the Planet of the Apes takes that fear to its logical extreme.
Racism and Slavery
The franchise repeatedly reverses the traditional relationship between humans and animals.
Humans become the oppressed minority.
Apes become the dominant civilization.
This allows the audience to consider racism and slavery from an unusual perspective.
The original films, particularly Conquest, used the ape-human conflict as a vehicle for discussing racial oppression and political violence.
Scientific Responsibility
The modern trilogy emphasizes scientific experimentation.
Caesar's intelligence is the unintended consequence of an attempt to develop a treatment for Alzheimer's disease.
The same scientific breakthrough that benefits humans ultimately transforms the relationship between humans and apes.
This is another version of the classic science-fiction question:
What happens when scientific progress produces consequences that its creators did not anticipate?
Animal Rights
The franchise has always encouraged audiences to question the assumption that humans are inherently superior to other animals.
The modern films make this especially explicit.
Caesar is intelligent, emotional, self-aware, capable of language, and capable of forming complex social relationships.
The boundary between "human" and "animal" therefore becomes increasingly difficult to define.
Civilization
Perhaps the deepest theme is civilization itself.
What makes a civilization?
Is it technology?
Language?
Government?
Religion?
Science?
Morality?
The apes gradually acquire many of these characteristics.
And as they do, they begin repeating some of humanity's mistakes.
The franchise therefore asks whether civilization itself inevitably produces conflict.
Why Planet of the Apes Has Endured
The remarkable thing about Planet of the Apes is that it has repeatedly reinvented itself.
The original novel was philosophical satire.
The 1968 film was a Cold War science-fiction thriller.
The sequels became an extended meditation on nuclear war, racism, slavery, and time travel.
The television shows turned the concept into adventure science fiction.
The 2001 movie attempted a modern reimagining.
The 2011–2017 trilogy became a character-driven story about Caesar and the rise of a new civilization.
Kingdom then shifted the emphasis toward the historical legacy of Caesar.
The basic premise remains the same:
What if apes became the dominant intelligent species on Earth?
But each generation has asked a different question about that premise.
Conclusion
Planet of the Apes is one of the most successful examples of science fiction adapting itself to changing cultural concerns.
It began with Pierre Boulle's 1963 novel, which questioned humanity's assumption that it would always be the dominant intelligent species.
The 1968 film transformed that idea into one of the most famous science-fiction movies ever made.
Four sequels expanded the story into a complex cycle involving nuclear war, time travel, social revolution, slavery, and the rise of Caesar.
The franchise then moved to television in 1974 and 1975, before returning to the big screen with Tim Burton's controversial 2001 remake.
The much more successful 2011 reboot changed the focus from humans discovering an ape civilization to showing how that civilization came into existence.
The Caesar trilogy—Rise, Dawn, and War—became one of the most acclaimed modern science-fiction film trilogies.
Then Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes took the story several generations further, turning Caesar from a character into a historical and almost legendary figure.
That may ultimately be the secret of the franchise's longevity.
The apes keep changing.
The technology keeps changing.
The special effects keep changing.
But the central question remains remarkably constant:
What does it mean to be civilized—and what happens when we discover that we are not the only species capable of civilization?
Comments
Post a Comment